JSSE indexed in the Higher Education Commission (HEC) Pakistan
For Reviewers
Reviewer Guidelines
How to Conduct a Review
-
Log in to the Submission System to access your assigned review.
-
If you have forgotten your password, use the “Forgot your password?” link.
-
Please respond promptly to invitations. If declining, suggest alternative reviewers where possible.
Before accepting a review assignment, consider:
-
Expertise: Accept only if the manuscript is within your area of expertise.
-
Conflicts of Interest: Disclose potential conflicts to the editor immediately.
-
Time Commitment: Ensure you can complete the review within the deadline (typically requires at least one hour).
-
Familiarity: If new to reviewing, contact the editorial office for guidance ( contact@finessepublishing.com).
Review Criteria
Manuscripts are evaluated on:
-
Novelty & Significance: Originality, contribution to social sciences/economics, advancement of knowledge.
-
Literature Review: Depth, organization, and theoretical/conceptual framing.
-
Research Design & Methods: Appropriateness, rigor, validity, and technical quality.
-
Findings & Implications: Clarity of results, conclusions, and relevance to practice or policy.
-
Presentation & Style: Clear structure, APA 7th edition formatting, logical flow, appropriate tables/figures.
High-priority manuscripts:
-
Explore under-researched regions, populations, or contexts.
-
Introduce new theories, frameworks, or methodologies.
-
Integrate theory with practice.
Comments to Authors
Reviewers should:
-
Provide constructive feedback for each section (Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, Results, Discussion).
-
Suggest improvements to figures/tables.
-
Highlight strengths and areas for improvement.
-
Use respectful, professional language (no ad hominem remarks, self-promotion, or personal identifiers).
-
Consider diversity, inclusiveness, and methodological variety in assessments.
Confidential Comments to Editors
(Optional) Reviewers may add confidential remarks for editors only, including:
-
Ethical concerns (plagiarism, duplicate submission, fraud, IRB approval issues).
-
Suspicions of citation manipulation.
-
Recommendations on whether additional review is needed.
Reviewer Recommendations
When submitting a review, select one of the following:
-
Decline Submission – Manuscript unsuitable for JSSE.
-
Resubmit Elsewhere – Better suited for another journal.
-
Resubmit for Review (Major Revisions) – Substantial changes required before reconsideration.
-
Revisions Required (Minor Revisions) – Publishable after minor corrections.
-
Accept Submission – Ready for publication with no major edits.
The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision, independent of reviewer identity, and may seek additional opinions if needed.
Confidentiality & Ethics
-
Manuscripts are confidential: do not share without editor permission.
-
Do not use or cite unpublished material.
-
Do not suggest citations to your own work unless scientifically necessary.
-
Report suspected misconduct (plagiarism, duplicate submission, ethical breaches).
-
Research involving humans or animals must have appropriate ethical approval—flag concerns if missing.
Recognition for Reviewers
The journal values the contributions of its reviewers and offers:
-
Annual Reviewer Acknowledgement published on the journal’s website.
-
Reviewer Certificates upon request.
-
Encouragement to record reviews in Publons (verified by the editorial office).
-
Option to link reviews to ORCID iD for recognition of service.
After Your Review
-
Treat the manuscript and your review as confidential, even after a decision.
-
You will be notified of the editorial decision.
-
On behalf of the editors, authors, and readers, we sincerely thank you for your contribution to the integrity and quality of JSSE.